Jan

23

Health Safety: How to Pack For an Admission to a Mental Health Unit

Filed Under (Health & Fitness) by health man on 23-01-2010

Tagged Under : , , , ,

Author: Shirley K Williams
Source: ezinearticles.com

If you know you'll be admitted to a mental health unit may be ready to pack properly. Unfortunately, most people have no prior knowledge of imminent admission to a psychiatric institution. Normally, a person is prepared with only the clothes on their backs. Later, the family and friends usually bring packs and household items and that is where the elements occur.Many you think the problems are quite normal not meet the criteria for admission to a psychiatry. There are usually very strict protocols in place to define what is and is not permitted for plants.

People are very surprised to know what needs to be taken at home. That said, we will explore why these restrictions.First, security is always a problem in the unit. When told you can not bring your nail clippers, you reply that you do not intend to hurt them. However, there are other people present in the environment they can. When first introduced into the device, you have no idea what problems or issues no one cares, and you may rent to be sure, there may be other elements that cannot.Some to be considered contraband and are denied belts, chains, shoes, razors, toiletries electric scissors, nail clippers, clothing with chains and metal rings and lots of zippers, T-shirts with slogans of alcohol or drugs, spiral notebooks, toiletries alcohol as a mouthwash, personally prescribe drugs, more drugs, art supplies, pens and pencils with erasers to remove the ends, support bra, jewelry, makeup, or large, health safety, quantities of cash.

Everything is brought back to the hospital performed and billed. The items listed above mean that the whole list of prohibited items. Each center has its own rules, but excludes almost all previous items.Please not get angry when you can not have something specific in the house. These rules are there to maintain security of all persons in the unit, both patients and staff. Please do not bring these items to the hospital with you asyour familywill asked to take home. If there is nobody to take these items to be stored in a smuggling area until you return home.

Unfortunately, this leaves room for items to be misplaced or lost, there is generally little room for the storage lot to start with space for hospitals limited, health safety, .Most accept responsibility for your belongings, so if you lose have no recourse. The best way to, health safety, prevent loss or theft of personal items is only to provide the necessary objects and inappropriate in the house. You just need clothes for a few days like most units will have access to washing machines.

You need something for sleep that protects you, because the staff will make rounds at night and go into your room to make a visual check on you at intervals of 15 to 20 minutes. You will be encouraged to dress each morning to the street will take clothing.Hopefully, reading this article, you'll be better prepared if you have to go to a psychiatric hospital for admission. For packaging properly, prevent the loss of personal property and prevent tampering.

As a psychiatric nurse for many years, I have seen the effects on the families of living day to day with someone who has a mental illness. These illnesses affect the patients, but also their families and in some respects even their communities. We have an obligation to watch out for others, especially those unable to do so for themselves.

For up to date information about mental health and mental health issues in the news, please visit The Mental Health Minute.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

No Comments Read More

Dec

14

Health Safety: Recent Success by Federico Grosso, DDS, PhD, MFT, BCFE, a Board Certified Forensic Expert Witness, in Helping a Mental Health Defense Malpractice Attorney Obtain a Summary Judgment Dismissal In a Major Lawsuit Involving a California Marriage and Family Therapist

Filed Under (Health & Fitness) by health man on 14-12-2009

Tagged Under : , , , ,

Author: Anonymous
Source: free-articles

SANTA BARBARA, CA June 16, 2004 -โ€” Federico C. Grosso, DDS, PhD, MFT, BCFE reported that he was involved as a forensic expert witness in a major malpractice case involving a mental health clinician and the violent death of a several people including the clinician’s client. Dr. Grosso’s initial responsibility was to read voluminous court records to discern the strengths and weaknesses of the case allowing him to prepare the defense attorney for the โ€œworst caseโ€ scenario. In this case, the unfortunate death of four people took place, including the client’s.

Due to the nature of the case and the potential exposure and liability of the clinician, a possible financial award to the plaintiffs could have been several million dollars.

Dr. Grosso used his profound knowledge of clinical applications, which he developed as an author of several academic texts on California legal and ethical applications for mental health clinicians. This helped him discern the complicated clinical interplays involved in this case regarding โ€œharm to self or othersโ€ and determine the plaintiffs’ position that the clinician had a legal โ€œduty to warn.

โ€ As he assessed the presented evidence, Dr. Grosso’s foremost duty was to assure that the defense malpractice attorney was not โ€œblind-sidedโ€ by the plaintiffs’ attorney for failing to maintain forensic objectivity in this difficult case. After completing his review of the evidence, Dr. Grosso was able to document that the defendants’ position in this case was correct: the clinician had assessed, diagnosed, and treated the client appropriately and did not have a legal โ€œduty to warn.

โ€ Dr. Grosso helped the attorney present this information clearly and precisely to the Court and based on the presented information, the Court dismissed the malpractice case in Summary Judgment (threw the case out of Court). Fortunately for the defense, the plaintiff’s attorneys never presented the weaknesses of the case identified by Dr. Grosso. Had they done so, the outcome could have been different.

As a result of this case, Dr. Grosso’s belief in the concept of โ€œsafe clinical practiceโ€ has strengthened.

He defines this type of practice as one where the clinician is fully aware of the legal requirements mandated by his or her license, the ethical standards dictated by applicable professional organizations, the maintenance of personal clinical objectivity, the implications of legal and ethical decisions, health safety, on his or her clinical practice, and having the Scope of Competence (training, knowledge, and experience) to treat the, health safety, presenting issues.

Legal experts also call this type of practitioner as a โ€œreasonable and prudentโ€ clinician. From this recent forensic experience, Dr. Grosso has added a new course to his Interactive Online and Self-Study Continuing Education programs. This course is titled โ€œThe Standard of Care For Managing Mental Health Crisis Issues.โ€ This course is a must for any mental health clinician who may have to face an unpredictable yet frightening and potentially destructive crisis issue during the course of clinical practice.

This course helps the clinician understand his or her legal and ethical duties, assessment requirements, risk factors, cultural issues, and appropriate clinical interventions, health safety, required to create safety when managing crisis issues.

Dr. Grosso uses a series of Interactive Online and Self-Study Courses, academic and clinical publications, practical clinical software, and statewide lectures for marriage and family therapists, clinical social workers, alcohol and drug abuse counselors, and certified addictions treatment specialists to enhance the development of a safe clinical practice.

These clinical resources are available from http://www.fgrosso.com.

In a recent presentation to new clinicians, Dr. Grosso stated that based on his court experience as an expert witness, most mental health clinicians make the following clinical mistakes: a) poor or no documentation of their therapeutic duty to assess, diagnose, and treat according to the standards of care; b) having inappropriate scope of competence (the training, knowledge, and experience) to treat the presenting issues, c) not staying current with changes in legal and ethical guidelines in their practice; d) not using an appropriate informed consent document to notify the client of the potential risks and benefits of treatment; e) not assessing appropriately for risk factors that can lead to harm to self or others, f) unintentionally breaching client confidentiality, g) ending treatment inappropriately, h) not having or using a treatment plan to document proposed treatment or to assess the progress of treatment, i) entering into inappropriate relationships with clients (friendship or sexual relationships), and j) failing to manage crisis issues appropriately.

Dr. Grosso’s continuing, health safety, experience as a forensic expert in malpractice cases led to the development of these resources. These cases have involved marriage and family therapists, clinical social workers, drug and alcohol counselors, and certified addictions treatment specialists. Dr. Grosso commented in a recent lecture, โ€œMany clinicians are unable to defend their clinical actions because they fail to document how they reasoned a specific clinical challenge.

They are unable to show opposing attorneys their duty to assess, diagnose, and treat the client appropriately throughout the duration of therapy or counseling due to poor mental health records and/or lack of appropriate training in mental health law and their specific professional ethical standards. They often write little or no clinical information about the patient because of improper training. In other cases, they, health safety, write too much information and when the mental health records are subpoenaed, the opposing attorney uses this excessive information to discredit the client and/or the treating clinician.

โ€ This leaves the door open for clients to sue their clinicians in these cases to recuperate losses suffered, health safety, in these court cases. This is especially true for California drug and alcohol counselors who are not bound by the mental health laws of the state and continue to treat clients without this legal foundation of safety.

Dr. Grosso’s earlier publications on psychotherapy standards of care have become benchmark guided to defending or litigating malpractice actions involving the above mental health clinicians.

Attorneys find that the concepts presented in these publications are easily applicable to all mental health clinicians, whether licensed or unlicensed, and that these concepts, as presented in these publications, are easily understood by juries. Many universities continue to use these publications in their classes to help students develop a safe structure of documenting both mental health records and progress notes to avoid potential malpractice and administrative actions. These publications are available at http://www.

fgrosso.com.

Background on FGrosso.com. FGrosso.com provides mental health clinicians with practical and easy-to-use clinical resources including practice enhancement workbooks, online and self-study continuing education, software, consultation as an expert witness, lectures, and academic publications. Dr. Grosso also provides expert witness services in malpractice actions involving marriage and family therapists, clinical social workers, alcohol and drug abuse counselors, certified addictions treatment specialists, and dentists accused of child abuse when providing treatment in the dental office.

He also lectures for and consults with mental health organizations. He is an official lecturer on law and ethics and other subjects for the California Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

No Comments Read More
« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline